One of the Best CRM Software For 2023

Our sample of Wisconsin property management companies includes 10 places throughout two (2) MSAs: Madison and Milwaukee. Among surveyed property management corporations from the Wisconsin pattern that disclose a management charge, the common charge is 7.10% of collected rent. Companies from the Tennessee pattern that disclose the cost of tenant placement bundled with management providers cost a mean price of 65.9% of collected rent. 75.0% is the common charge for tenant placement only amongst Wisconsin property management corporations that charge a proportion of unit rent. Among surveyed property management firms from the Texas sample that disclose a management price, the common charge is 8.87% of collected rent or a flat fee of $100.80. 83.9% is the common price for tenant placement solely among Texas property management firms that cost a proportion of unit rent. Among the many few that advertise lease renewal providers, the average payment is $199.50 or 33.3% of the unit’s first month’s rent. Advertised setup fees range from $150.00 and $495.00 among the few firms from the Tennessee sample that disclose such fees. One (1) firm from the Oregon pattern advertises setup fees, charging $150.00 every. Two (2) property management corporations from the Oregon pattern promote inspection charges, charging $75.00 and $150.00, respectively.


Among the few property management corporations from the Tennessee pattern that cost inspection charges, expenses vary from $75.00 to $198.00 each. Among the many few property management firms from the South Carolina sample that publicize inspection charges, the typical price is $76.33 every. Among property management firms from the North Carolina sample that cost inspection fees, the average price is $112.00 each. Property management companies from the South Carolina sample that publicize a flat charge for lease renewal cost a mean month-to-month fee of $231.80. Companies from the South Carolina sample that publicize management companies for a flat fee charge a monthly average of $88.60. The few firms from the Wisconsin sample that offer management providers for a flat charge charge a month-to-month common of $104.33. Among the many few that charge a flat payment begin at $99.00 and common $155.75. 62.5% is the common price for tenant placement only among Oregon property management corporations that cost a percentage of unit rent. Companies from the North Carolina sample that disclose the price of tenant placement bundled with management companies cost a median charge of 54.5% of collected rent. Companies from the South Carolina sample that disclose the price of tenant placement bundled with management providers charge a mean rate of 67.7% of collected rent.

Among surveyed property management firms from the South Carolina sample that disclose a management payment, the average rate is 9.08% of collected rent. Among surveyed property management companies from the North Carolina sample that disclose a management price, the common rate is 8.89% of collected rent. Among surveyed property management corporations from the Oregon pattern that disclose a management payment, the common charge is 8.43% of collected rent. Among surveyed property management firms from the Utah sample that disclose a management payment, the average price is 8.55% of collected rent. 80.7% is the average charge for tenant placement solely amongst Washington property management firms that charge a proportion of unit rent. Companies from the Utah sample that disclose the price of tenant placement bundled with management providers cost an average fee of 39.8% of collected rent. Among surveyed property management companies from the Tennessee sample that disclose a management payment, the common fee is 8.86% of collected rent. Among surveyed property management corporations from the Washington sample that disclose a management payment, the common price is 9.40% of collected rent.

69.6% is the typical payment for tenant placement solely amongst North Carolina property management companies that cost a percentage of unit rent. Companies from the Texas sample that disclose the price of tenant placement bundled with management providers charge a mean fee of 76.6% of collected rent. Among the few firms within the Utah pattern that publicize tenant placement solely, the common payment is 82.1% of the unit’s first month’s rent. Companies from the Washington pattern that disclose the price of tenant placement bundled with management companies charge a mean rate of 70.4% of collected rent. Two (2) companies from the Oregon sample promote the cost of tenant placement only ($300.00 and $580.00) and tenant placement with management providers ($300.00 and $1,160.00). Setup fees range from $99.00 to $350.00 amongst companies from the Texas sample that disclose such charges. Among the many few that advertise setup service costs, fees begin at $45.00 and common $153.75. One (1) company from the new Mexico pattern advertises a setup payment, charging $250.00.